Rise of Populism: A Threat to Liberal Democracy

Liberal democracy has demonstrated significant resilience against populist threats in the long term, primarily due to its association with superior policy outcomes. However, the question of whether populism continues to pose a threat to liberal democracy remains critical. This is because the appeal of populism is deeply rooted in the social aspirations of people for a dignified and prosperous future, making it an intrinsic part of liberal democracy. Consequently, during challenging times, populist leaders often exploit this appeal. While the liberal components of constitutional democracies are directly threatened by populism, their impact is mitigated to some extent by the robust institutional framework of liberal democracy.

Illiberal ideologies, including populism, often wait for opportune moments to exploit public frustration over major policy failures. They employ divisive rhetoric to garner electoral support and sway public opinion. For democratic and liberal forces to counter these challenges, it is essential to address the very issues that populists capitalize on. Demonstrating the tangible benefits of liberal policies is crucial to restoring public trust and diminishing the electoral and policy influence of populist and illiberal movements.

The Fate of Hasina Wajid: A Lesson for the Autocratic Regimes

To achieve this, liberal political parties must adopt proactive measures. First, increasing democratic engagement is essential. Governments should involve individuals and non-governmental organizations in the legislative process, ensuring that their voices are heard and considered in policymaking. For instance, the European Union and national legislative bodies should broaden stakeholder participation in legislative initiatives, which would help enhance political transparency and accountability.

Governments must also embrace open and transparent decision-making processes to prevent decisions from being made behind closed doors. Strengthening systems of checks and balances is equally critical. Liberal and democratic governments should establish independent institutions and oversight mechanisms to monitor governmental actions and minimize institutional misconduct. Reinforcing the separation of powers is another key step in ensuring that no single branch of government wields excessive control.

Economic measures are vital in countering populist narratives. Populists frequently exploit economic hardships and income inequalities to fuel public discontent. Addressing these issues requires fostering a strong, open economy characterized by free markets, social mobility, and sustainable economic growth. Removing trade restrictions at both national and EU levels can promote economic integration and development. Improving living conditions through targeted social and economic policies can help mitigate the sense of disillusionment that often drives populist support.

Moreover, liberal democracies must address everyday challenges faced by their citizens, such as high unemployment, rising living costs, and limited access to basic rights. These issues threaten the stability of liberal democracies and incite hostility against their foundational principles. By implementing effective policies to tackle these problems, liberal and democratic governments can strengthen their credibility and counter populist rhetoric.While immediate threats to liberal democracy are apparent, it is important to maintain a balanced perspective. Overreaction to populism can lead to unnecessary fear and paralysis. A pragmatic approach grounded in reality, rather than fear, is essential to navigating the challenges posed by populism.

At What Point Does Populism Endanger Democracy?

Populism threatens liberal democracy when it adopts certain characteristics. Specifically, it becomes dangerous when it is racist, culturally exclusive, or dismissive of pluralist principles that value opposition and diversity. Populism also poses a threat when it seeks to impose restrictions on fundamental freedoms, such as the press and association. Even when populist movements refrain from overtly discriminatory practices, their majoritarian nature can still undermine democratic values. Their distrust of established institutions and tendency to bypass or weaken them further exacerbate these risks.

2024’s Elections: Global Status Quo under Siege

One significant challenge posed by populism is its potential to undermine democratic institutions. While democracies require periodic reform to address stagnation and outdated practices, populist-led reform efforts often spiral out of control, damaging the very institutions they aim to improve. When populism becomes extreme, unrestrained, and uncompromising, it is more likely to pose a serious threat to democracy. This is particularly evident when populist leaders, once in power, gain unilateral control over government functions. For instance, in countries like Hungary and Turkey, populist regimes have consolidated power and eroded democratic institutions. Examining how populists wield power and the rhetoric they employ is crucial in assessing the extent of their threat to democracy.

Another important aspect to consider is the transnational nature of populist movements. While there is no concrete evidence of populists conspiring across national borders, there is substantial circumstantial evidence that they borrow strategies, rhetoric, and models from one another. This diffusion of ideas and tactics amplifies the influence of populist movements globally. For example, when an illiberal populist party gains power, implements policies, and claims to have delivered for the people, it inspires similar movements in other countries. Historical parallels can be drawn to the 1920s and 1930s when fascist and communist ideologies spread rapidly across Europe and beyond. Although the current situation is not as dire, the patterns are concerning.

The international context also plays a significant role in enabling populist threats to democracy. First, many leaders who seek to establish or expand authoritarian regimes believe that the international community will not hold them accountable for their actions. This lack of accountability is particularly evident outside Europe and has even diminished within it. Second, some leaders, particularly in Africa and Asia, perceive alternative alliances with powers like China and Russia as viable options, even if democratic nations impose sanctions. The growing geopolitical rivalry between the West and these authoritarian powers resembles the Cold War era, where strategic alliances often took precedence over democracy and human rights.

Conclusion

Populism becomes a threat to democracy when it adopts exclusionary, authoritarian, and uncompromising traits. While liberal democracy has inherent resilience against populist challenges, its institutions and principles must be actively defended and reinforced. This requires addressing the root causes of populist discontent, such as economic inequality and lack of public trust in democratic institutions. Additionally, fostering international cooperation and accountability can help counter the global diffusion of populist ideologies.

Ultimately, the threat posed by populism is not insurmountable. By addressing its underlying causes and demonstrating the tangible benefits of liberal policies, democracies can counter populist rhetoric and maintain their stability. However, the failure of powerful democracies to act decisively against the rise of authoritarian populism could exacerbate the problem, allowing illiberal movements to gain traction globally.